Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

uncommon1 66M  
664 posts
1/22/2024 1:53 pm
Beforehand (reply)


You state unequivocally that
"in a BDSM dynamic, even a
little mystery can be not only
problematic, but outright
dangerous".


uncommon1 66M  
1406 posts
1/22/2024 2:00 pm

but then you state unequivocally,
"I want to stress though, that leaving
the scene totally in the Dominants
hands to surprise the submissive
should only be done when the
submissive has full trust in the Dominant".

Can you explain how someone can trust
someone that wants them to do dangerous
things??


brandygirasol 54T
9427 posts
1/22/2024 2:41 pm

Sir I can explain it.... Plenty of prior communication everything the DOM might tell me to do IF I object to something we can fine tune it. Some things are taboo so the DOM needs to tell me how he wants things to be in advance. I know who the DOM is and cumming to my place to play. We can't do everything on first date things have to advance to "risky" activities like bondage. I've never had a problem and I'm not really looking for profound relationships -moving in and living slave gurl lifestyle 24/7 anyway....👄


uncommon1 replies on 1/22/2024 4:14 pm:
IF I object to something we can fine tune it.

Fine tuning or being flexible sounds
good.
But that isn't what Ron professes.
Don't you recall his blog, "absolutes", he
posted earlier in which he state that there
are basic premises that must be "absolute",
like safety. You must remember it since you
post about how true that was.

Maybe you, like others reading his blogs are
confused by all his contradictions.


Become a member to comment on this blog