Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > > My Blog |
|
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
|
I am not sure that there is a natural progression - tenuous or not - from Sub to Slave but both parties in consensual D/s have to be attentive to this so that if it does happen it is intentional. As to the "seed", I tend to agree that submission or domination is bred in the bone. It is not something you act as, it is something you are.
| ||
|
i tend to agree with what You've written about "the seed", as well as NNFU's comment. In a way it's the nature or nurture argument. To me, truly submissive individuals, those not simply playing a part, have the need to submit embedded in their personalities. Sometimes it comes to the forefront at an early age, sometimes later in life, and some probably suppress it forever.
| ||
|
the first two....coercion and capitulation to me. not submission.... there is no consent, or negotiation, there is no balancing of needs going on there... I'm not sure that there is a distinction between sub and slave and pet and brat and little and hucow or any other version ....I have considered them all and thought: yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes..... honestly....to me the word is just a preference, its interchangeable....I am all of them, they are all of me.... I think its more interesting to consider how a different personality or connection could draw out a different aspect of a let's call them 's-type'. they might be a pet with one but a slave with another....because of the natural interaction between the two.... but its all theory with me, I have not tested that out.....just speculation.
|
 |
 |
 |
| Become a member to comment on this blog | ||
 |
×
×