Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > alteridalterego > Sensual Symphony |
|
HARD Science Throughout life, I’ve always thought of science as being totally objective with the goal of research being the same, but have learned over time it’s merely an ideal and that science and research can sometimes reveal hidden agendas and say something about the scientist/researcher or general school of thought at a particular time. I’ve read various books over the years citing Alfred Kinsey’s well known research and believe we have a lot to thank him for as he opened up so many doors sexually by bringing it out in the open. Without his pioneering efforts, we may not have Alt today. I came upon his original data a few years ago in a library and found myself riveted to the countless pages of numbers trying to develop conclusions of my own. After some time, I discovered something I found amusing as well as disappointing and disconcerting. One area of focus surrounded sex organ measurements which seems scientific enough; scientists often take lots of measurements, however, it suddenly dawned on me there was so much data available on penis related physiology and so little on the vagina by comparison. Even breasts didn’t measure up to the apparent obsession he had with male dimensions. It seemed there were lots of details missing. After all, if it’s important to know the circumference, length, etc. of men, surely, we need all the detailed dimensions of all the interesting female parts. I feel more research needs to be done!  |
|||
|
Thank you rose! I'm thinking I could just do it like Mr. Kinsey posting surveys and having everyone measure themselves, then we can analyze the data. It's interesting to me though and really the point of posting this how much men in general are obsessed with numerical data pertaining to their genetalia and some are obsessed with breast dimensions as well but for some reason, men don't seem preoccupied in the least with measurements of the vagina or the clitoris etc.
| ||
|
Naughty, that's an interesting question to me actually. What is the process for fitting a woman for a diaphragm? It can't be similar to the way a tailor measures me for a suit! LOL That reminds me of one particular man who enjoyed that process way too much, retaking measurements several times to suspicious levels! I thought I saw you mention in some nasty adventure or another here . . . Surely, you have me confused with someone else as everyone here knows I only think pure thoughts!  That's another interesting idea to measure internal sizes. I like the way you think! Great idea! See, this is all in the interest of science of course! 
|
 |
 |
 |
| Become a member to comment on this blog | ||
 |
×
×